BreakPoint Blog

Banner
Banner
Work: Sparking a Revolution
Rating: 4.00

Mike Rowe’s Dirty Jobs has become a smash hit. While I’ve only seen a couple of episodes, it has given me and ever greater appreciation for the various dirty work people do to make our lives easier and our communities beautiful. 

Besides giving people an “ick” thrill, Rowe is doing us another favor—he’s elevating ‘dirty’ work. Society can’t only run on so called desk jobs because someone has to muck the putrid trash from the city dump.

Rowe isn’t the only person who’s elevating manual labor. A few years ago, designer Debbie Travis started a show called From the Ground Up, where contestants try and win the top spot as the best designer gaining experience and a huge cash prize. Besides achieving her goal of making the house beautiful, Travis’ aim is bigger. Travis maintains that young people don’t have a work ethic, and she wants to help a few of them develop it while also helping them develop a passion for the trades.

She’s right, the series showed the lousy work ethic and dearth of character amongst the contestants, but it also showed something else. Rowe, Travis and others like them, are hoping to spark a revolution amongst the trades by training people to take pride in their work—becoming craftsmen in their own right.

We all pay for shoddy work. A good illustration of this can be seen on Holmes on Homes show staring renovation expert Mike Holmes. Holmes fixes the shambles other “tradesmen” make, maintaining that people should do "it right the first time."

Instead of viewing work as a means to a paycheck, people like Rowe, Travis, and Holmes are elevating work.

Many contemporary writers have addressed the fact that it was the Christians who first elevated work. Until Christians did, people held “work in contempt,” says Rodney Stark. Stark’s goes on to say, “Notions such as the dignity of labor or the idea that work is a virtuous activity were incomprehensible in ancient Rome or in any other pre-capitalist society.” 

Sadly, a lot of Christians seem to have forgotten the significant of work and their own rich heritage of elevating work to its proper place. We should be showing people the significance of work, but instead, like the rest of the culture, many of us work for a paycheck. We ought to be at the forefront of taking those seemingly insignificant tasks and doing them to our utmost for God’s glory?

I’m delighted that some television shows are encouraging high standards of work among the “twentysomethings.” Christians, from the pulpit to the grocery stores, should also be sounding clarion call to people that regardless of whether you get ick under your finger nails from building or sweeping, to teaching or calculating things, all work is God’s work.

Now, for a bit of fun: for some reason, I had a bit of a giggle fit over Rowe’s six “Tenets in Defense of Dirt.” Let me know if you have any new ones to add to his list.

Comments:

As for a strong economy, Ben, the US ALWAYS had a strong economy-even in George Washington's day.

The key to a strong economy is a healthy middle class, a government with an interest in supporting the market, and a market with an ability to deal with large amounts of resources.

This in turn requires that loyalty be taken for granted by rulers and honesty be taken for granted in the market. In a good economy contracts will be able to support complex systems of abstractions that can generate vast amounts of resources. They can do this because people can trust strangers.

Without all this you cannot have a thriving economy. You can have Marco-Polo style warrior-merchants of the type that appear in sagas. These after all deal in portable goods and can sometimes provide their own police. These also however prefer a civilized economic structure, and when it is not available, they have often invented it.
Scientists are less the prime builders of civilization then technicians. A culture can have brilliant scientists but ineffective technicians. Eastern European cultures often have been. The result is dreadful.

A culture needs only a tiny handful of scientists and it should not have more if it comes at the expense of other areas of life. But a general habit of technical skill is a remarkable gift to any culture.

Suppose for instance there was a nation whose scientists were among the brightest in the world, but whose general population was illiterate. The result would be that the tools they import or produce would have to have a disproportionate focus on simplicity to the neglect of potential effectiveness. To get anything done, it would be necessary to draw on basic human endurance to make up for lack of technical skill.

That was what Russia has long been like, which was why the Trans-sib railway cost so much casualties to
build just to start with.

America by contrast, has always had an extremely high supply of technicians. This was a large part of what built it. In our grandfather's day, very few teenager's could comprehend an automobile; but most knew how to take care of one.

Scientists should be separate from technicians; they are and should be an elite profession. Technicians must be produced in great numbers. They need not comprehend great theories but they do need to be competent enough to put them into practice.

Churchill once compared Russia to a giant with great muscles, the brain of a genius-and no nerves.
I think what Rowe says is right on - too many Americans are unwilling to do dirty or hard work.

That said, manual labor is slowly becoming less and less important. Many kinds of production are becoming automated, and other work is being sent offshore where it can be done cheaper. So, if the US wants to keep a strong economy, we'll have to keep training top scientists/engineers/technicians.. and science and engineering both require college education.
Agreeing with christopher scurlock
I think Mr. Scurlock (comment above) nailed the typical high school's LIMITED VISION!

Have we really reflected on how much brains and skill it takes to design,build, maintain, repair our complex life infrastructure??? Acountants, business majors, medical persons, most government officials and lawyers can't do it...Persons with specific technical skills must do it!


ALSO---note that the link to Mike Rowe's Dirt Tenets...refers to that great hands-on organization - the Boy Scouts. Am GLAD to have a son learning all the wonderful, diverse hands on stuff they teach...! Mike Rowe, an Eagle Scout, was their significant speaker at the Jamboree this year - and he also made an appearance at RailCat field in Gary IN (Chicago metro area) earlier...

Boy Scouts, and organizations like them, can lead the way to make our kids more well rounded...
Christopher Scurlock - got it!
My biggest "College Prof promoting elitism" moment was when my education prof talked about how "some ethnic groups" did better on school tests...and "OTHER ethnic groups" didn't do so well on school tests. He aimedthis remark at me - as I was/am Scandinavian in origin, and that group (overall_)apparently didn't do so well on some kind of academic test.

***Later, I reflected on how we all
1. Sat in a well built building (Scandinavian Americans - have lots of builders-carpenters---at least in the Midwest. Likely some worked on--maybe even designed--this college building or others like it.)

2. And we All SOON were going to eat a decent lunch (Scandinavian Americans - in the Midwest - did lots of farming. Probably grew part of the food we would eat.

----But the VALUE taught to the students was clear...Successful test taking was MORE IMPORTANT than the "hands on" trades.
What's the point of college prep if college itself isn't prepping for anything?
I think the school system
in the US discouraged any affinity to dirt/work.

It took out shop and home ec classes, and kept emphasizing "college prep". Most of which is keeping clean and studying at a desk.

Professional educators kept telling parents that their kids "needed" to go to college to get a good job...and parents didn't want their kids to live a their hard lives, swinging hammers, knocking tin, etc.

Schools are now largely evaluated by their college-based curricula, or students' acceptances to colleges.*

*Note: I remember reading Colson discuss the success of a Christian school in this term. It was very disappointing.
Cool! I'll have to try it out with my grandsons.
I believe dirt clods thrown against a wall make a cool resemblance to an explosion.