R.I.P. Ray Bradbury
By: Gina Dalfonzo|Published: June 6, 2012 11:04 AM
The author of
Fahrenheit 451 and other sci-fi classics has died at the age of 91. Obituaries are
here and
here.
Kim tells me that Chuck Colson was a fan of Bradbury's
Something Wicked This Way Comes.
Comments:
http://www.mtexpress.com/index2.php?ID=2005142336
Time to compile a summer reading list for me and my children. I think I'll sprinkle Proverbs throughout the summer to continue to instill in them good work ethics that they might avoid the work practices that lead to combative lawsuits.
The 2009 BBC version of Emma starring Romola Garai, who also played William Wilberforce's wife in Amazing Grace, is much better - in my opinion - than the version you've seen:
http://www.amazon.com/Emma-2009-Version-Romola-Garai/dp/B002XTBE6K/ref=sr_1_2?s=movies-tv&ie=UTF8&qid=1339097271&sr=1-2
After I've read The Illustrated Man and you've read Emma, then we could both open up some Dickens - I need to give him a second chance! *ducking swinging objects*
Ellen, it is thrilling to see you here again. I hope the school year closed out successfully for all. And "Emma" is on my Android phone, jockeying for position in my reading list thanks to my negative reaction to Gwyneth Paltrow's portrayal (which may have been accurate, but I plan to read with an eye toward finding a reason to like the main character). Thanks to you I've now read several Austen works (and I'm forever indebted to you for your persistence), and I can rather confidently assert that while Austen was a master of prose, Bradbury was a master of poetry-as-prose. And here's an offer for you, Milady: I'll move "Emma" to the head of my reading list if you'll move "The Illustrated Man" to the head of yours. Please note, though, that there is a cost: if "Emma" moves up, all those Charles Dickens works must move down a notch. Wretched man that I am, I'll be disappointing someone. :(
As the language usage of authors has been mentioned here, Jane Austen's writing is also to be savored for her articulation.
And I agree with Lee about the beauty and the power and the shapes and the magnificences of words. I think perhaps the most beautiful line in English is said by Horatio, when Hamlet dies:
Now cracks a noble heart. Good night, sweet prince,
And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest.
And oh!, how I wish those who read Scripture would read it with some heart and some passion. For instance, read Jer. 2:1-3:10 aloud, trying to convey the intensity of the Lord's feelings and responses. It's quite a breadth of emotion conveyed in that section! For preachers, it almost preaches itself.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/302032/thoughts-ray-bradbury-orson-scott-card#
"Fahrenheit 451" just moved up several places in my stack of reading. I want to see if it mentions the benefits of memorizing a work by speaking it aloud. Not only does reading aloud give the lungs and vocal chords some exercise, it also, I think, engages neural pathways that would otherwise be dormant and slack-jawed (rather like someone perpetually glued to the TV - although today, many stories cannot be consumed in book form, including, say, "House"). I am always saddened to hear Scripture read aloud in churches in a mechanical, dispassionate, wooden manner - especially the Psalms - and I'm minded to do something about it. Max McLean does a wonderful job in enunciating clearly, but his lack of enthusiasm distresses me; many passages are meant to be screamed, or roared, and others should be laughed. I'm going to think about this, deeply.
“It’s not books you need, it’s some of the things that once were in books. The same infinite detail and awareness could be projected through radios and televisors, but are not.”
I find this to be so incredibly true. I can watch a movie based on a book and see what is happening right in front of me. But when I actually sit down and open a book, I use my imagination. I picture in my mind what the characters and settings look like and how the story is playing out as I read, using my creativity, and that is something only books can seem to do. It's more fun that way.
I wish more people would sit down with a good book. It's great "brain exercise".
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/06/04/120604fa_fact_bradbury#ixzz1x1g6C1pp
In large measure, my inspiration to put words on paper came from sentences like "It floated up above the apple trees, over the beginning-to-sleep town, and across the night among the stars." The joy that I get from reading phrases of such high writing quality is yet another reason I'm drawn to this blog.
Bradbury also got in a lot of trouble, not long ago, by saying in crude and emotional detail that the Obama presidency would be a disaster for the USA. He was mostly dismissed as a senile, grumpy old coot, at the time. I wonder what those critics would say now.
If I can decrease my stack of books (including some Austen; still trying to keep my promise to Ellen), I'd like to add "The Martian Chronicles" and "The Illustrated Man" to the list. The two books you mention, G, are already in the stack.