
What is the defining characteristic shared by all humans, which we cannot change? Once upon a time, it was the realization that we are, as John Calvin said, "incurably religious" beings. We long to worship something, and find Someone to whom we can devote ourselves. Indeed, we must. Because that characteristic defines us, religion was long seen as the gatekeeper to which all feelings, ideas and desires must submit. The higher moral order to which individuals and societies bound their choices and behavior (including sexual behavior) demanded subjection.

And while the modern age and its confusion of secularism with neutrality pretends it can bypass this characteristic, it has committed itself fiercely to an entirely new religious dogma
—one before which everything, including laws, religious beliefs and even the rights of others to hold such beliefs
—must kneel. Why? Because personal desires are now viewed as sacrosanct, and the determining characteristic of all men and women.
As John Stonestreet argues in this week's
"ReSeries" video commentary, a great reversal has taken place. In order to understand the conflation of the homosexual "equality" movement with the African-American civil rights movement of the 1960s, and the deployment of terms like "bigot," "hatemonger" and "homophobe" against orthodox Christians, we must realize that our culture really has come to view sexual inclinations as inherent and defining features of what it means to be human. In this paradigm, sex has replaced religion as the gatekeeper and reality before which everything else must submit. So it's only natural that when
NBA athlete Jason Collins came out as the first openly gay member of a major league sport, members of the media were beside themselves with delight,
and buried sports commentator Chris Broussard beneath shocking outrage for merely expressing the traditional Christian teaching on sex.
Our culture has changed the way it defines humanity, and Christians are increasingly viewed not simply as advocates of a different opinion which ought to be tolerated, but belligerents and purveyors of hatred whom society cannot tolerate, and must silence. How do we repond? Well, that involves calling our culture back to what defines us as people, and challenging the idea that sexual inclinations amount to inherent characteristics which we must praise and accommodate. That ugly, biologically deterministic idea not only excuses sin and brokenness, poisons dialogue and robs us of our freedom to disagree. Ultimately, it reduces us to something less than human.
It's time to offer our culture a better definition.
Explore This Week's Theme
 |
In this week's edition of our "ReSeries" video commentary, John Stonestreet discusses how the Western world has traded one definition of what it means to be human for another. >>Watch now.
|
 |
In his most recent Talking Points, T. M. Moore takes stock of the cultural landscape and urges Christians to adopt a new tack for pushing back the darkness. >>Read more. |
 |
In Friday's BreakPoint commentary, John Stonestreet broaches a controversial subject, suggesting that part of the reason evangelicals have been so ineffective in responding to the cultural push for so-called "gay marriage" is because evangelicals accepted decades ago, without question, what has become the vanguard of the sexual revolution: birth control. >>Read more |
 |
John Stonestreet offers a startling and shameful example of what happens to Christian orthodoxy when tolerance becomes the all-overriding virtue of one's worldview. >>Read more. |
 |
John Stonestreet interviews Mike Adams and Jeff Myers of Summit Ministries about preparing your student's worldview for the crucible of college. >>Read more. |