BP_blog
Why Evil? Why This Evil?

Thoughts on Aurora



It’s the question that won’t go away. So what do we think and say in the face of the sort of evil we saw in Aurora last week? Stay tuned to BreakPoint.

Listen Now | Download


John Stonestreet

The late Christian philosopher Ron Nash called the problem of evil and suffering the most perennially difficult issue Christians have to face. And as much as we might like to ignore the problem, events like what transpired in that Aurora, Colorado movie theater Thursday make that impossible.

Ignoring evil is a fundamentally wrong approach for Christians. Christianity is a worldview that claims to explain the world as it actually is, and the only world you and I have ever lived in is the one that is deeply and broadly impacted by evil.

Plus, to remain silent in the midst of events like this is to ignore the conversation that the culture is having with—or about—God right now. C.S. Lewis thought that suffering was God’s “megaphone,” and it’s true.

Of course, this conversation about God’s existence and goodness in the light of evil is not easy. Simplistic platitudes like “time will heal” or haphazardly lobbing Romans 8:28 grenades can be like rubbing Christian-ese salt into gaping, emotional wounds. Remember, Job’s friends were pretty helpful for their suffering friend: Until they opened their mouths.

It’s important to remember that while Christianity offers an explanation for the existence of evil per se, when Christians offer specific reasons for specific evil, they over-speak their biblical and theological qualifications. Applying logical answers for the existence of evil to the emotional and personal struggles associated with a particular evil is to miss how Jesus Himself confronted it.

In the face of His weeping friends whose brother had just died, Jesus wept too. In fact, He wept despite knowing that He was going to raise Lazarus from the dead and turn the family’s weeping into celebration. Why would He weep if He knew all this? Because it was the world He had made and the people He had fashioned in His own image that were broken.

To paraphrase the title Neal Plantinga used for his book on the impact of human sin, this world is “Not the Way It’s Supposed to Be.” And because we live in a world that often veers so distinctly from the good design and order given it by God, trying to offer a tidy explanation for this evil or that evil is futile.

And at the same time, it’s quite valid to ask why we recognize evil as such. Why do we recognize the actions of the gunman as disordered but honor the three men who lost their lives by shielding their girlfriends? Or 21-year-old Stephanie Davies, who chose to apply pressure to her friend’s severe wound rather than save her own life?

You see, if ours is merely a world “red with tooth and claw”—that is, if ours is a creator-less world that arose by chance, and nature has no rhyme or reason—then heroic acts would be indistinguishable from despicable ones.

But no. Our ability to recognize evil as evil reveals something about how we are made.

And still the final word we Christians can offer is one we must offer: God is not absent. He is present in the world of human suffering, and He Himself suffered too. Here I quote the English minister Edward Shillito, after seeing the carnage of World War I:

If we have never sought, we seek Thee now;
Thine eyes burn through the dark, our only stars;
We must have sight of thorn-pricks on Thy brow,
We must have Thee, O Jesus of the Scars.

The other gods were strong; but Thou wast weak;
They rode, but Thou didst stumble to a throne;
But to our wounds only God's wounds can speak,
And not a god has wounds, but Thou alone.

Further Reading and Information

Higher Things: Jesus of the Scars
Edward Shillito

Explanation of 'red with tooth and claw'

 

Making Non-Sense of the Colorado Shootings
Mark Galli| Christianity Today| July 22, 2012

Not the Way It's Supposed to Be: A Breviary of Sin
Cornelius Plantinga | Eerdmans Publishing Company | January 1995

How Now Shall We Live?
Charles Colson, Nancy Pearcey | Tyndale | August 1999

The Problem of Pain
C. S. Lewis | HarperOne | February 2001

The Problem of Evil is Everyone's Problem
Brett Kunkle| The Point, BreakPoint.org| March 14, 2011

Gratitude, Joy in the Midst of Suffering
Robin Phillips| Christian Worldview Journal, BreakPoint.org| March 12, 2012

Unspeakable: Facing Up to the Challenges of Evil and Suffering
Os Guinness| The Veritas Forum | November 19, 2009

Stunned
Gina Dalfonzo | BreakPoint.org | October 10, 2008

Loss of a Loved One
T. M. Moore| Christian Worldview Journal, BreakPoint.org| March 13, 2012

As We Forgive
Stephen Reed | BreakPoint.org | July 20, 2009

A Severe Mercy
Sheldon Vanlauken | HarperOne | July 1987

Lament for a Son
Nicholas Wolterstorff | Eerdmens Publishing| January 1987

 


Comments:

Total: 148 << Previous Page     Next Page >>
Why Was Aurora Hero Recognized?
@William Reed

The acts of heroism in the midst of the Aurora massacre further underscore the atheist's "problem of good." A great example is college student Jarell Brooks who helped Patricia Legarreta and her two kids escape the theater even though it meant being shot in the process. (Mr. Brooks did survive and is okay.)

http://moveonup.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2579286%3ABlogPost%3A58676&commentId=2579286%3AComment%3A58690&xg_source=activity

Brooks' actions are even more striking compared to those of Legarreta's boyfriend, who left her and the kids behind when the bullets started flying. Not surprisingly, the media hails Jarell Brooks as a hero while the boyfriend is portrayed as a coward.

This goes back to the flaw of the "creator-less universe" worldview. If we human beings are the result of evolution, then shouldn't the boyfriend's "survival of the fittest" actions be more worthy of praise? However, after every massacre, those who resist the urge to flee and instead help others are celebrated.

Clearly, there MUST be some universal moral code to explain why heroism is still praised even our anti-Christian, PC culture.
Silence can be golden (and comforting)
Great point, John, about the need for silent comfort in the face of unexplainable and sometimes intolerable pain. Weeping and an otherwise silent presence speak volumes more than some threadbare cliche or empty platitudes. There may come a time later for counsel, but an encouraging hug or a simple "I'm so sorry" is all that's needed for the moment. In times like these, Chesterton's observation makes sense: "The problem with the world is not that it's reasonable, or that it's unreasonable; but that it's almost reasonable, but not quite."
What about the "problem of good"?
Yes the problem of evil is a sticky one for Christians. We know that God has a purpose for evil (Romans 9) even if we do not understand His purpose.

But atheists have a problem also. How do they explain good? Why do people risk and lose their lives for others? If survival of the fittest is how nature is ruled why do humans care for the weak and the sick? A mother cat will allow her sick newborn kitten to die. A mother (and father) human will give up most of their life to care for a sick child. Why? How does an atheist explain this? Why send money to poor countries? We are fitter, they are weaker why do we care? Is there something special about humans? (Genesis 1:27)

We as Christians should be ready to defend our faith, but we should also be ready to ask some questions to our atheist friends about their "faith" also.
Total: 148 << Previous Page     Next Page >>